Remarks for Chapter 249
①Child star-borns can’t make it to the end. The fundamental reason is not that they can’t choose a good movie, but that they can’t choose a fan base.
Different from adult filmmakers, child stars are a very complicated group. There is only one possibility for them to become popular, that is, in the past, all fan groups were killed. As a result, the fan base is very heterogeneous.
Mom party, father party, sister party, brother party, and peers.
It is true that the fan base covers a wide range, and it is true that child stars can set amazing records one after another. However, as they grow older, there will always be some people who will lose their fans. Unlike other adult stars, they are a fan The group is the harvest of a fan group, but the fan group of child stars is always falling down.
In this way, no matter what kind of starting point a child star is, there will only be an ending of falling.
Looking at all the child stars in Hollywood, none of them can start in Tianhu and go to the end. Those who are popular at the beginning will all go downhill later, and when they go downhill, child stars can only make two choices.
One is to cater to peers, and the other is to cater to adults.
Catering to peers, the most obvious example is the Olsen sisters.
In reality, they do what they do at any age.
But unfortunately, this approach only made their peers support them for a little longer.
The adults gradually lost interest in them, and finally changed careers.
Catering to adults, the most obvious example is Macaulay-Culkin.
That's right, it's the protagonist of "Home Alone".
He has been making movies about good kids, but unfortunately, this approach made him lose the basic set of his peers.
In fact, in Hollywood's replay report, in Warner Bros.'s final report on "Master Weiweikuo", they pointed out the limitations of the development of child stars. Then, all the child star can do is to keep on, to keep on, until... he dies.
This is actually a very cruel thing.
Because what kills child stars is not at all whether they have personality, whether they are loved by their peers, or whether they are perfect, they will only be liked by those adults, but the capital actively abandons them after seeing their value drop.
Because of this, you left me a message saying 'Roland is too good, he won't fit in'. This is not a problem faced by child stars in reality at all. The problem they face is being abandoned after maintaining an image.
Whether you are good or not, you will be abandoned in the end.
So how to solve this problem?
I wrote the previous chapter.
Pull one to one, let doubt overshadow perfection, let authority feel empathy, so that women can drive the box office.
Only romance movies can make a child star out of the identity of a child star.
This is the solution.
I know seeing this, some people will think, isn’t this just my imagination?
Hey, I'm really not imagining this.
There are successful examples in reality, but he is not a child star in the pure sense.
Before talking about that person, there are a few prerequisites I want to talk about.
First of all, you should be clear that Hollywood is a bottomless muddy water, and no one is clean.
Anthony Hopkins was fired from the National Theater in the 1960s because of his habitual drinking. He himself said, 'At that time, as long as it was something that didn't need to be chewed, I would drink it. '
Jack Nicholson publicly stated that he used to drink Cocaine during the filming of "The Shining".
Robert De Niro voluntarily mentioned in his biography that he and Martin Scorsese both took Cocaine.
Al Pacino admitted that he and Robert De Niro used Cocaine until dawn during the filming of "Heat."
Steve de Sousa confirmed that Jean-Claude Van Damme could **** ten grams of Cocaine a day during his role in "Street Fighter".
The crew of "Apocalypse Now" is a drug field.
Seeing this, many people think it’s okay.
These big names are bad, but that doesn't stop the public from liking them!
America is such a free place!
Okay, let's look at the second article.
Lindsay Lohan is drinking, swearing, GG.
Kristen Stewart, crazy split, GG.
Drew Barrymore, swear, GG.
Many people may think that I have changed the concept secretly when they see this.
But in fact, if you look carefully, you will find a problem. Those who have no GG are all becoming famous after adulthood, and those who have lost GG are all child stars. There are many other examples, and you can find them by yourself.
This corresponds to the first key point I mentioned. Child stars only lose their basic boards, and there is no such thing as adding basic boards.
Because after they exploded, the basic disk was already full.
And it is impossible not to lose the basics, because if you show your personality, those adults will not like you. If you don’t show your personality, your peers will not like you. In this way, what you can do , that is, you can only divide your own fan base.
The successful example in reality is Robert Downey Jr.
Donnie started acting when he was five years old. Although he didn't become popular, he was also a child actor. And what he did, I don't need to say more, right? Drunk and snarled, pointed at the judge's nose and scolded in court, and then became popular after playing Iron Man.
Is it because the Americans think his behavior is cool?
Stop kidding, okay?
When Downey played Iron Man, he was still scolded by people.
The root of his success is that he has a good father.
His father took all of Downey's faults on himself, saying that he taught Downey how to hate grass when he was eight years old, and that what Downey did was due to his lax parenting.
Speaking of this, some people may find out, hey, isn’t Downey just a prodigal son?
right!
This is fundamental!
Anthony Hopkins, Jack Nicholson and others are all prodigal sons!
Everything they did was not revealed while they were doing it, but after many years of feeling, I did so many ridiculous things back then, but I quit now, so you can see that those people are rotten, and some people like them!
Not for fans! It's that when fans like it, they don't even know what they did!
The image back then was exceptionally perfect, now it’s just reminiscing about the past and adding that I was once a bad boy!
It is the previous news that is blocked so that their perfect image will not be damaged by ridiculous things! It's not that the current news is so developed that people think that the guys who do those bad things are really awesome and really cool!
Do not believe?
In the process of Johnny Depp and Amber Heard tearing up the beep, how many opportunities did the two miss?
Many people think that the people in America have a high tolerance for celebrities, which is actually a factor of the development of the times.
The stars who are in their early years, or the scandals that are breaking out now, are scandals that damage the image, and the previous news that is breaking out now is all about letting the past go. This is actually the same as we can calmly talk about Amao and Xiaoqing now. But he didn't let Fan Xiaopang go.
No matter which boundary it is in, it is all past blame.
This is also the reason why the harder it is for stars to ascend to the altar.
Because the message is transparent.
I didn’t know it before, but now I know it all.
Because of this, I wrote a big chapter of the announcement. I originally wanted to write that the reason why Roland maintains a perfect image is to not lose any basic disks, but...you are asking too much, so I will beep first one day.
And secondly, Roland’s publicity routine is exactly the same as Robert Downey Jr.’s routine of getting up again, but he really didn’t do those things that his peers think are cool.
But other than that, throwing the blame on the media and asking MJ fans to help speak out is actually the same as Downey throwing the blame on Dad and letting Marvel fans help speak out. I just feel sorry for Downey's comeback A slight modification was made, changing the injury to no injury, and continued to win over all fans painlessly.
②Why should I use an illegitimate child as a breakthrough.
This is actually the same reason why Americans like "good elites".
First of all, you think that Americans do not like perfect people, which is correct, but the factors that caused this situation are actually the neoliberalism that emerged in the 1980s in America. One of the main points is to reshape Class power creates elites and lets elites lead the people forward.
But you know, this is bullshit, because the elites have succeeded in widening the gap between rich and poor.
So, after the financial crisis in 2008, a wave of anti-elite emerged.
But the problem is that Americans are also very contradictory. If they reverse all the elites, then there will be no one.
In this way, a very strange situation appeared.
Jobs was a scumbag when he was young. He has a special personality and is a good elite.
Bezos abandoned his wife to become a female anchor. This is why middle-aged men also have dreams. He is a good elite.
Marx is simply Iron Man alive! Run the train with the grass, Green Depp, you are too down-to-earth! It's a good elite.
Comrade Chuan Jianguo is funny every day, and his gestures are so cute when he speaks. He is trustworthy and a good elite.
In this way, we will see that Americans like elites with individuality very much.
Why?
Because it is the era of mobile Internet, let us be in line with international standards.
Before that?
This is not the case.
To give the simplest example, the 38th Grand Commander (1976-1980), Jimmy Carter; no tattoos, no smoking, no drinking, no swearing, living a simple life, has been living in a two-bedroom In the farm cottage.
After retiring, he won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2002.
This is the reliable elite they elected at that time.
Why are you talking about him?
Because when this guy was in office, the unemployment rate in the United States was as high as 7%, and the inflation rate was as high as 10%.
People can't find a job while facing rising prices.
Then, he lost re-election and an actor took his place.
However, Jimmy Carter is a good old man. After the actor took over, he also congratulated the other party and gave him advice, "If the U.S. economy still can't improve, then you should scold your ex severely, saying that he left you a mess." . '
Then, this trick is now learned by Brother Jianguo.
While he scolded his predecessor, the American people would also sympathize with him. He is just an actor, and he has done a very good job now!
We have to give him time, because every time he speaks, he leaves me with hope!
So, hope came.
In 1981, Soros of Quantum Fund won the first annual huge loss in his life.
In 1982, Dario of Bridgewater lost his fortune, and Buffett was crazy about buying bottoms.
Then from 1983, inflation fell from 10 percent to 1.9 percent in 1986.
The unemployment rate dropped from 11 percent to 5 percent in 1988.
At that time, there was a very famous sentence.
In economic life, confidence is more important than gold.
From then on, with the admiration of neo-liberalism, people slowly began to like elites with individuality.
That actor is the very beginning, an elite with personality.
But it didn't officially break out until 2008.
During this period, there was an interval of twenty-eight years.
Therefore, in that era when only young people emphasized individual elites, breaking the beautiful persona was to completely throw away the adult fans. Blame the 'bad', to the media, to the times...I want to be bad too! But the media is so vicious, I can't help it!
In terms of psychology, this is called false altruism.
③ An illegitimate child is actually a conflict of beliefs.
Before 1973, abortion was banned in the United States, and if young people were pregnant and had children, they would really be discriminated against. This was admitted by Jeff Bezos and his mother.
He was the illegitimate child, and his mother lost her job because of it.
So, America, which encourages openness, was actually very twisted at the time.
After 1973, the United States allowed abortion, and young people thought it was a cool thing to have children.
Using the words of the good elite before me, this is called having personality.
Roland did this kind of thing, it is called personality, he failed to do it, it is the fault of the times.
It's not that Roland doesn't want to be bad, but that there are too many bad people around him, and he can't be bad.
But for those who have experienced those things, this is not personality, but death.
It is precisely because of this confrontation that the young people can be attracted and the old people can be defeated.
Then when it was reversed, let Roland be the victim.
And in 2003 Bush signed the anti-abortion bill.
After this, it is the struggle between pro-life and pro-choice.
The former is evangelical and the latter is Protestant liberal.
Precisely because young people are pregnant, giving birth to a child is a very complicated problem, but it is not a fatal problem like Luantong, so I will write it as a breakthrough, because it can attract everyone's attention in an instant, But it's not a crime that deserves to die. It belongs to the type of topic that can be escaped by playing tricks.
④The book "Entertaining to Death" is really interesting. I think everyone who does publicity and publicity should read that book.
...
There are a lot of beeps, I just want to make a note for the previous chapter, and take out those things that are explained in the text but take up too much space and talk about them separately. situation to write.
I think my explanation is clear enough. There are more than 4,000 words.
(end of this chapter)
This content is taken from freewebnove(l).com